← Search

Izumi Harris

Princeton Junction, NJ
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 105W–60L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Izumi Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
Linda Eno / Marie Robinson
2023-05-04 · Nassau 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olga Carey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-04-27 · Nassau 2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Nui Chan / Mary Chion
2023-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyler Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
Matthew Lieber / Shannon Boczon
2023-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with AUSTIN KIM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2022-12-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lance Henrickson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2022-12-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Midori Yano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Cirasola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-11-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Midori Yano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Meldrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
89.2%
33W–4L · 71.8% of games
3.5
59.2%
45W–31L · 55.9% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams