← Search

Helene Ginsburg

Scarsdale, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 93W–98L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Helene Ginsburg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-09-09 · TIA NR Schuler 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Patricia Meyers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · with Meron Shewarega championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Christina Razook / Cristina Lievano
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Behr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · Southern: TIA 3.5 Sauerborn 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Meyers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Julianne Schmidt / Medea Elvy
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Strating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · RRC Set 2 Win 55+ 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Moriarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Strating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.1%
66W–56L · 51.9% of games
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 33.5% of games
7.0
56.4%
22W–17L · 50% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
36 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer