← Search

Dana Cellucci

Chadds Ford, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 167W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Cellucci to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history257 matches
W
Helen He / Rebecca Feinberg
2026-08-09 · #4 Doubles · with Kristen Goodman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Kristen Goodman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Kristen Goodman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Kristen Goodman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Summer Slammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Parris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · D'Amico · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Vo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-2
W
2026-06-29 · Summer Slammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Parris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-25 · Summer Slammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Vo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Summer Slammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Damico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · Love Me Nots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Hay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.1% of games
3.0
62.9%
22W–13L · 57.5% of games
3.5
77.8%
49W–14L · 62.1% of games
4.0
59.2%
42W–29L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams