← Search

Doris Higgins

Downingtown, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 108W–188L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Doris Higgins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history296 matches
W
2026-07-08 · After Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Miller Time Too · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Parcells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
W
2026-06-29 · After Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · Miller Time · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ekaterina Swearingen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · Westtown · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · Uber Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · Westtown · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-19 · Uber Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Flambaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Uber Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · After Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Miller Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Cutrona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Uber Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Ferrarelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.8% of games
4.0
36%
50W–89L · 44.2% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 40.6% of games
8.0mixed
35.9%
42W–75L · 45.8% of games
9.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
73 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert