← Search

Ann Marie Valentine

Troy, MI
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 51W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Marie Valentine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-06-18 · TROY-Lamar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · TROY-Lamar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · TROY-Lamar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Tack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · TROY-Lamar 18s 3.5 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Tack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2024-06-06 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-23 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2024-05-16 · 1WESS-BARRY AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marianna Perakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-07-19 · 4WESS-BARRY AD40&O 40DW WED SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-07-18 · 5TROY-LIVINGSTON AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura DuBay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2023-07-11 · 5TROY-LIVINGSTON AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Coleen Giniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-06-22 · 4WESS-DIMSDALE AD40&O 40NW TH SEM F4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Dimsdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2023-06-21 · 4WESS-BARRY AD40&O 40DW WED SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Sage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
100%
9W–0L · 80.7% of games
3.5
92.3%
24W–2L · 69.2% of games
4.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer