← Search

Christina Endrud

Birmingham, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
242 matches · 149W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Endrud to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history242 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Stephanie Snell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Stephanie Snell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · BRC-Endrud 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Snell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · BRC-Jacobson 18s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natalie Hazen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · PINE-Raab (outside) 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Olivia Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · BRC-Jacobson 18s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · BHAMCC-Strachan 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · BRC-Endrud 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.1%
111W–57L · 57.1% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 39.8% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 54.6% of games
8.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal