← Search

Andrew Cecil

Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 47W–34L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andrew Cecil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-09-06 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zachary King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-17 · WW - Prince/Rabhan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-15 · WW - Prince/Rabhan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Rabhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Thomas Weck / Jimmy Lee
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Mike Webb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Kyu Choi / Daniel Kim
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Mike Webb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · WW-8.5 Ninjas - Baker · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Heah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
Sriram Gopalakrishnan / Rajakumar Chithambaram
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Will Carli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dutch Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Nilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.9% of games
4.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 56.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.7% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.7% of games
8.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 56.3% of games
8.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams