← Search

Jesse Smith

North Chesterfield, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 166W–117L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jesse Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
L
2026-07-19 · Magnolia Green Hold My Racquet - Sebetic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bert Teachey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · Magnolia Green Hold My Racquet - Sebetic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with EJ Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · ACAC Lewis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-20 · Magnolia Green Hold My Racquet - Sebetic · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bert Teachey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · ACAC Lewis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · Magnolia Green Hold My Racquet - Sebetic · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-02 · ACAC Hollomon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-29 · ACAC Lewis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · ACAC Heller · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Forgey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-13 · ACAC Lewis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · ACAC Heller · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Reinhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-23 · ACAC Hollomon · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
100%
11W–0L · 74.7% of games
3.5
60.9%
39W–25L · 53.9% of games
4.0
34.4%
21W–40L · 45.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.7% of games
7.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45% of games
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 64.6% of games
6.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 70.3% of games
7.0mixed
81.5%
44W–10L · 63.4% of games
7.5mixed
40%
6W–9L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
77 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King