← Search

Megan Ramey

— year-end
18 matches · 10W–8L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Megan Ramey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2025-05-22 · CSCC SPANTON · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-08 · CSCC SPANTON · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Hoelscher-Ayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-17 · CSCC SPANTON · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ohl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-06-09 · CSCC RAMEY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-05-19 · CSCC RAMEY · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-05-12 · CSCC RAMEY · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-04-21 · CSCC RAMEY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-05-16 · CSCC GRAHAM · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eddie Ramey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2021-04-11 · CSCC GRAHAM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eddie Ramey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2020-08-20 · MEMPK FLANNERY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Scholtes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-08-06 · MEMPK FLANNERY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Flannery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2020-07-23 · MEMPK FLANNERY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams7 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 70% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 50.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
3 matches
#2 Singles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova