← Search

Anne Nikolaus

Haverford, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 16W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anne Nikolaus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
Kara Charbonneau / Fabienne Zangerle
2026-09-09 · Cynwyd Court Couture · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristin Kobell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Eby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Frey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Eby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-06-29 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-25 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-14 · Lanc CC - Groff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Shelton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-23 · Lanc CC - Groff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Newman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-02-16 · Lanc CC - Groff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Groff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Kelly Myers / Jennifer Small
2024-10-06 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-19 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-07-14 · LCC - Newman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.4% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.3% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Singles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova