← Search

Natalie Levinson

— year-end
58 matches · 38W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Natalie Levinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Ava Doane / Liv Atkinson
2026-06-01 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · Low Tri W MM Frazier · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · Low Tri W MM Frazier · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.8%
21W–6L · 59.4% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 54.7% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 53.5% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#1 Singles
31%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer