← Search

Omid Mosadeghi

— year-end
80 matches · 40W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Omid Mosadeghi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-05-17 · HOL-Sanford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · KTC Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rubinder Dab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-12-06 · KTC Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rubinder Dab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · KTC Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rubinder Dab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-19 · HOL Sanford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rizwan Hamid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · HOL Sanford · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-07 · HOL Sanford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Hagelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-31 · HOL Sanford · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-05-17 · HOL Sanford · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rizwan Hamid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-01-04 · FSSC Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-12-22 · FSSC Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristian Dickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-11-16 · FSSC Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rubinder Dab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
46.9%
23W–26L · 51% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 47.1% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#2 Singles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova