← Search

Rizwan Hamid

— year-end
51 matches · 25W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rizwan Hamid to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-08-29 · HOL-Hamid · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Hagelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-15 · HOL-Hamid · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Tobe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · KTC-Heinz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with JP Heinz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · KTC-Heinz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · HOL-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Stansberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Damon Wick / Vidyashankar Revan
2026-06-25 · KTC-Heinz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · HOL-Sanford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rahul Nair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · KTC-Heinz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clayton Burkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · HOL-Sanford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Stansberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · HOL-Hamid · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · QRRC-Sanford · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · QRRC-Sanford · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 60.1% of games
3.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 46.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
20%
10 matches
#2 Singles
20%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova