← Search

Linda Nagelhout

Hillsborough, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 45W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Nagelhout to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-02 · TStefan-HS · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Webb-Murrah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · DNagelhout-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kempel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · TEdwards-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with DAVID DELINSKY mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · DNagelhout-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Van Blalock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · DLiller-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Van Blalock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Denhard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · DLiller-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darrell Bradfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Susan Bernstein / David Molpus
2026-06-16 · DNagelhout-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Liller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · DLiller-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Denhard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · DNagelhout-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darrell Bradfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · DLiller-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Van Blalock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · TEdwards-HS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dave Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56% of games
3.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 43.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–8L · 31.9% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.7% of games
6.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.2% of games
3.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 50.9% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert