← Search

Mary Griffiths

— year-end
87 matches · 54W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Mary Griffiths to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
Alyssa Burke / Stephanie Jabusch
2026-09-13 · ALynch-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Ederle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-09 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · ALynch-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bingjie Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · LFarber-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · ALynch-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · LFarber-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynne Farber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · ALynch-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · ALynch-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Ederle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-05 · MGriffiths-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · MBland-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ed Slanker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 61% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 45% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.7% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.1% of games
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#3 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer