← Search

Tammy Hood

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 66W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tammy Hood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-07-29 · YDeaver-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · YDeaver-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · YDeaver-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · YDeaver-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lloyd Calhoun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-17 · YDeaver-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lloyd Calhoun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-09 · ACP.Chambers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-5
L
2025-07-24 · YDeaver-ENO · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanuel Haile mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-19 · YDeaver-ENO · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-30 · ACP.Chambers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-16 · ACP.Chambers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Bahto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Stephanie Wright / Amy Rogers
2025-06-09 · ACP.Chambers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-04 · YDeaver-ENO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
60%
21W–14L · 54.5% of games
3.0
29.1%
16W–39L · 40.1% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.5% of games
5.5
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.2% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.9% of games
3.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.7% of games
6.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
41 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams