← Search

Pamela Howell-Davis

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 121W–146L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Pamela Howell-Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history267 matches
W
2026-09-06 · PDavis.40.5.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Virginia Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-26 · PDavis.18.5.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susanne Schmal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · LBible-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Nagy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · PDavis.40.5.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · JYoung.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carl Laird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · JYoung.40-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Russell Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Brubaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Stephanie Bailey / Delisa Ordronneau
2026-07-05 · PDavis-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucy McMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-21 · PDavis-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marta Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · JYoung.40-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Petree mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · JRanheim-TOCH · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · PDavis-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
54.3%
38W–32L · 50.3% of games
3.0
35.6%
32W–58L · 40.2% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 28.8% of games
5.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.7% of games
5.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 53.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
52 matches
#2 Singles
11%
28 matches
#1 Singles
10%
27 matches
#3 Singles
8%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova