← Search

Janice Stevens

MADISON, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 57W–65L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Janice Stevens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-02-27 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Leduff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-25 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Mccrory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-21 · Holley, Gena · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-12-07 · Holley, Gena · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · Holley, Gena · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-26 · Holley, Gena · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Panter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-07 · Watson, Lee Anne · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ellery Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-09-30 · Watson, Lee Anne · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Nations
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-28 · Watson, Lee Anne · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrea Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-17 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-09 · Watson, Lee Anne · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lindsey Wiseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.2% of games
3.0
64.6%
31W–17L · 53% of games
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 42.3% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 53.6% of games
6.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#2 Singles
15%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova