← Search

Gena Holley

Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 67W–89L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Gena Holley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Holley, Gena · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-09 · Shannon, Rhonda · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Amanda Galey / Amanda Carter
2026-08-19 · Shannon, Rhonda · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Holley, Gena · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Sylvester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Shannon, Rhonda · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Kathleen Biggs / Christina Johnson
2026-07-22 · Shannon, Rhonda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Shannon, Rhonda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
Summer Morrissette / Jennifer Richardson
2026-07-14 · Holley, Gena · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meghan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · Shannon, Rhonda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · Holley, Gena · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rena Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Taylor, Alyssa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kamryn Lantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · Taylor, Alyssa · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kamryn Lantz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.8% of games
3.0
54.8%
34W–28L · 53.3% of games
3.5
6.2%
2W–30L · 31% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games
6.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 55.2% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer