← Search

Anna Catherine Cargile

Little Rock, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 28W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anna Catherine Cargile to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abby Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abby Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandi Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Pinter/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with CJ Simon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Rainey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · Pinter/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Castens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · Shaddock/Corbin/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · Shaddock/Corbin/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandi Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Tess Bradford / Amy Lynch
2026-04-13 · Brown/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meagan Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-07 · Shaddock/Corbin/LR/Rebs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-10 · Brown/LR/Rebs · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 59.9% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#2 Singles
11%
5 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams