← Search

Barrett Rankin

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 61W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barrett Rankin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-09-13 · MD.Hoffman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lukas Jantac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · De.Meares40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alan Melichar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · De.Meares40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Sluder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · An.Pham18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Martinelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · An.Pham18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-15 · Jo.Diamond40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stan Wingo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-31 · Jo.Diamond40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Shait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · An.Pham18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · An.Pham18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Martinelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-24 · De.Meares40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cody Sutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-03 · De.Meares40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alan Melichar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Scott Schwartz / Chris Johnson
2025-08-28 · De.Meares40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cody Sutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 58.8% of games
4.0
47.8%
22W–24L · 50.4% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.6% of games
7.5
37.1%
13W–22L · 46.4% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal