← Search

Stan Wingo

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 108W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stan Wingo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
L
2026-08-30 · MD.Hoffman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Moncrief
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Je.Pollack40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Takayuki Yamato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Je.Pollack40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Shait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Je.Pollack40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Ian Campbell / Charles King
2026-07-23 · Co.Vinson18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Co.Vinson18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Markham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Co.Vinson18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Maginnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Cameron Burch / Ian Campbell
2026-07-07 · Co.Vinson18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Fultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · Co.Vinson18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with West Ludwig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Co.Vinson18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Markham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-16 · Co.Vinson18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-16 · Co.Vinson18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Fultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
58.4%
45W–32L · 53.7% of games
4.0
45.3%
24W–29L · 47.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 34.5% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.8% of games
7.5
61.4%
27W–17L · 56.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
53 matches
#3 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova