← Search

Nancy Hanula

FREDERICKSBURG, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 72W–88L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nancy Hanula to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-18 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Susan Seeley
2026-07-23 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Christman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Christman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-12 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Manheim Tennis Club - Evans · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Stegman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · Hempfield MTC (Evans) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Stegman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.7% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 47.5% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 51.6% of games
7.0
25%
5W–15L · 42.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.6% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
32.4%
11W–23L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#1 Singles
19%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova