← Search

Jennifer Graham

Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
312 matches · 116W–196L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jennifer Graham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history312 matches
L
2026-09-13 · RCW - Sumar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jody Sambrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Blitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Eagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Tobin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Hempfield Hangen 18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Lingenfelter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-5
L
2026-06-23 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Schlageter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lore Rigano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Blitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · RCW - Rigano/Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Dimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
47%
39W–44L · 51.7% of games
4.0
30%
18W–42L · 40.1% of games
7.0
45%
9W–11L · 48.6% of games
8.0
8.2%
4W–45L · 30.3% of games
7.0mixed
54.8%
34W–28L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
31.6%
12W–26L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
123 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
104 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
65 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer