← Search

Angel Batkins

Columbia, MD
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 153W–50L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Angel Batkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
L
2026-05-09 · Jakubik · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Miranda Bishard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Jakubik · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexandria Agee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-5
W
2026-04-12 · Jakubik · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Danielle Desfosses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · Vissering - Mixed Groundies & Lobs · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renaldo Savady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lydia Juh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lydia Juh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-03-20 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renaldo Savady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-14 · Chaney/Helmer · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alan Chaney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-01 · Chaney/Helmer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Cady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · Chaney/Helmer · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Cady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-18 · Chaney/Helmer · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alan Chaney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-01-11 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lydia Juh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 66.4% of games
4.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 65.5% of games
5.0
50%
7W–7L · 50% of games
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 59% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.3% of games
10.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
4.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 63% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.2% of games
8.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 59.2% of games
9.0mixed
75%
54W–18L · 60.2% of games
9.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer