← Search

Beth Wager

Dayton, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 56W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Wager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-06-27 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Culley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Susan Stewart / Sarah Hedrick
2026-05-17 · SRTC-Miller · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-16 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-08 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Fahrenholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samanta Jraisat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Colleen Murphy
2026-04-17 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · SRTC-Holbrook · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Siefke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · SRTC-Holbrook · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-08 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.7%
47W–28L · 55.3% of games
3.5
19.4%
7W–29L · 37% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 32% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
54 matches
#2 Singles
18%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer