← Search

Greta Rath

OTTUMWA, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 145W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Greta Rath to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
L
2026-06-23 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisa Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-11 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dominick Rath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-13 · Fink & Snedegar: Life Time · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Snedegar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-16 · Whipp/Pham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Greiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-02 · Rath · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Logan Storto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · Fink & Snedegar: Life Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christi Bird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-12 · Whipp/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Arthur Hermange mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-10-05 · Rath · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dominick Rath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-04 · Fink & Snedegar: Life Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Duenow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-14 · Whipp/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Rothert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-27 · Smith - Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Torgerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 56% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 36.7% of games
4.0
50%
24W–24L · 52.3% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 45% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 57% of games
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
68.9%
42W–19L · 55.1% of games
9.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#1 Singles
11%
26 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King