← Search

Amara Andrews

Cedar Rapids, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 19W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amara Andrews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-07-14 · Brown/Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cassandra Kotek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Brown/Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cassandra Kotek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Brown/Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cassandra Kotek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · Brown/Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Knierim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Brown/Andrews · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · Brown: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Knierim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-06 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · Brown: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-01-30 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-10 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-09 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Damisch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-03 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.1% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
37%
10W–17L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King