← Search

Jack Hu

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 111W–96L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jack Hu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history207 matches
W
2026-08-30 · SPanthri.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nate Wireback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · SPanthri.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Henrique Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · SPanthri.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Henrique Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · TOC.Perian · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · TOC.Perian · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · TOC.Perian · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Katrina Shah / Trung Tran
2026-07-30 · HRoss-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynsey Easley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-29 · TOC.Xu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rodney Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
Matthew Johnsen / Dallas Knight
2026-07-23 · HRoss-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · HRoss-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
Andrew Pham / Aubry Carmody
2026-07-15 · TOC.Xu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Iocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · SLlewellyn-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Sowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60.7%
65W–42L · 53.4% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
61.3%
19W–12L · 52.1% of games
8.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 41.1% of games
4.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 59.5% of games
4.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
56 matches
#1 Singles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert