← Search

Gabriel Iocco

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 118W–116L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Gabriel Iocco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
L
2026-08-23 · TOC.Xu · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rodney Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · TOC.Xu · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alec Bergeron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · TOC.Xu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Sheppard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Ry.Sheppard18S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-30 · Ev.Fultz18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Ev.Fultz18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Osman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Andrew Pham / Aubry Carmody
2026-07-15 · TOC.Xu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-10 · TOC.Xu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · HRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynsey Easley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Ry.Sheppard18S · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · HRoss-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Scherr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · TOC.Xu · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.4% of games
4.0
49.6%
70W–71L · 51.3% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 34% of games
7.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.9% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.3% of games
4.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 23% of the time
#1 Singles
23%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#2 Singles
14%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
31 matches
#3 Singles
7%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal