← Search

Jaevonna Beck

Highland, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 75W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jaevonna Beck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Penny McCord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-10 · Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hardin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-24 · Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Willes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-10 · Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allyson Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-03 · Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-20 · Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-2
L
2025-12-02 · Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
56.9%
37W–28L · 53.3% of games
3.5
59.4%
38W–26L · 53.9% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Singles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe