← Search

Diane Hayes

Holly Springs, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 31W–47L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Diane Hayes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-08-27 · CAS.Pedersen · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jane Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · CAS.DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Terri Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-21 · CAS.Belyea · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Artieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · CAS.Belyea · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Diana Fisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
Curlee Petty / Jennifer Smith
2026-07-08 · CAS.Trail · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Harelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Beth Johnson / Donna Lee
2026-06-03 · CAS.Trail · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Harelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossana Bolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Susan Hoffman / Barb Leblanc
2026-04-27 · CAS.DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dell Pinkston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-20 · CAS.DeAngelis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dell Pinkston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-14 · CAS.DeAngelis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dell Pinkston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-08 · CAS.DeAngelis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossana Bolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
55%
11W–9L · 52.2% of games
3.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 40.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games
5.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 47% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova