← Search

Jennifer Holloman

Raleigh, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
287 matches · 195W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Holloman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history287 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · He.Tuttle40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberlie Meeker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · TOC.Meeker · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Herring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · Je.Holloman40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Bason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-20 · He.Tuttle40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Rebecca Jacobsen / Cathy Williams
2026-08-20 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Sh.Agresta18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Bason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-14 · Je.Holloman40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with KATRINA SIZEMORE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Suzanne Brown / Lori Mayes
2026-08-07 · Je.Holloman40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Celeste Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Erin Alvarez / Kim Bowman
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Elise Hamilton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Julie Dearman / Jennifer Thomas
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elise Hamilton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Shannon Garlington / Kim Sims
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elise Hamilton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.5%
82W–36L · 60.3% of games
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.5% of games
6.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 60.2% of games
7.5
69.6%
48W–21L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
123 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
55 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova