← Search

Paula Nelsen

Longmont, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 85W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paula Nelsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-16 · LTA-Q GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marcel de Graaf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · LTA-Q GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Isaac Lennon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · LTA-Q RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Peoples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · LTA-Q RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Korniczky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Mcreynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · LTA-Q ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Korniczky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · BTA-C YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Korniczky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · LAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Korniczky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · BTA-C YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Peoples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · LTA-Q PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68.6%
59W–27L · 56.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.6% of games
8.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 55.3% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert