← Search

Sue Burns

— year-end
209 matches · 115W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sue Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Grand slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kerns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-02 · Grand slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Lowenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Lowenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Set2Win · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Prab Pannu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-13 · Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Abdelazim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Spottek Silver · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Prab Pannu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Spottek Silver · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · Spottek Silver · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Starke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-08 · Binghamton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Coe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · Binghamton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Coe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-10-04 · Binghamton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Coe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
81.7%
49W–11L · 63.4% of games
3.5
18.9%
7W–30L · 38.3% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
76%
19W–6L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer