← Search

Lynda Otis

— year-end
39 matches · 20W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lynda Otis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andra Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Sikora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marylou Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · Syracuse: Fredrickson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Sikora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marylou Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-29 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andra Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-25 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindy Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-05-14 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maiken Westergaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marla Share
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe