← Search

Kristen Starke

— year-end
122 matches · 33W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kristen Starke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Machovec championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #4 Doubles · with Lynn Perry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-28 · Grand slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · Grand slammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Baseline bandits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Sladish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · BING: Slammer sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Baseline bandits · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Spottek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · BING: Slammer sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · Grand slammers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · BING: Slammer sisters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Machovec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-12 · Grand slammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Machovec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · Baseline bandits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Sladish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
28%
7W–18L · 43.5% of games
4.0
27%
10W–27L · 40.3% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert