← Search

Ashley Doyle

Wilmington, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 78W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ashley Doyle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Phelps · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Bonfiglio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-07 · Hickman 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Helen Mathias-Hinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Renata Kuperus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Phelps · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Phelps · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-26 · Waddle 18+ 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Mattingly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · Phelps · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · Wilson/Parker Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Porcelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · Wilson/Parker Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Porcelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · Brandkamp 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Bastable mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Bastable · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan Bastable mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · Brandkamp 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Bastable mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 62% of games
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 60.1% of games
4.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 45.4% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 61% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.7% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.9% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.4% of games
4.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.6% of games
4.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova