← Search

Renata Kuperus

Hampstead, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 84W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Renata Kuperus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-09-07 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kylie Knapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-06 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Waddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Hickman 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madison Seidel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-08-11 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Pugh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Sarah Thomas / Karly Fitzgerald
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Krystal Glasgow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · Bastable · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bradley Ransome mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-07-26 · Bastable · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Barefoot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-25 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Niggebrugge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Guilherme Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
Adam Greene / Cari Hopson
2026-06-08 · Niggebrugge/Parker 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Guilherme Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · Parker/Glasgow · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 64.1% of games
4.0
100%
8W–0L · 77.9% of games
4.5
100%
12W–0L · 73.4% of games
7.5
100%
10W–0L · 75.6% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.1% of games
4.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 77.4% of games
4.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 65.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
14%
14 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert