← Search

Caleb Palensky

PAPILLION, NE
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 13W–12L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Caleb Palensky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2023-08-29 · Palensky/Palensky · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Bindl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-08-15 · Palensky/Palensky · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Eglseder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-08-01 · Palensky/Palensky · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Palensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-07-05 · Palensky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Palensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2023-06-24 · Palensky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Eglseder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-06-17 · Palensky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Palensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-06-10 · Palensky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Mancuso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2023-05-17 · Palensky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sam Palensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-13 · Palensky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sam Palensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-08-09 · Neese · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Palensky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2022-07-16 · Marupudi/Neese · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Mancuso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2021-09-21 · NE-Neese · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Thorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 53.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe