← Search

Irmgard Redman

Ypsilanti, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 16W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Irmgard Redman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-08-07 · CHIP-Schorer 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Schorer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · CHIP-Schorer 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Maiz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Emma Hurston-gates / Roy Farmer
2026-07-24 · CHIP-Schorer 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Schorer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Thiele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-10 · CHIP-Shaw 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xianghong Feng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · CHIP-Shaw 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Padma Nallamothu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Inok Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Inok Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-16 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Schorer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Scheurer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-27 · CHIP-Shaw 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Inok Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 51.1% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams