← Search

Vivian Marley

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 107W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vivian Marley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
2026-07-13 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigid Quint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hisae Yoshihara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hisae Yoshihara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · LIB- Marley 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bullock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Diana Heckert / Stacie Rein
2026-06-11 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Skochelak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigid Quint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brigid Quint
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-28 · LIB-Yoshihar 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ehren Dirksen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · LIB-Dawson 40s 3.5 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bullock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Zampi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-03-22 · LIB-Marley 35 WOMEN winter SINGLES F1 · #3 Singles · 7.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.6% of games
3.5
59.7%
40W–27L · 52.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
6.5
80%
12W–3L · 65.5% of games
7.0
49.1%
26W–27L · 49.1% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
54 matches
#3 Singles
10%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert