← Search

Inok Chung

Ypsilanti, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 61W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Inok Chung to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-07-09 · CHIP-Lartigue 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Buffy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irmgard Redman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irmgard Redman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · CHIP-Lartigue 55s 7.0 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Scheurer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cyndy Mickevicius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irmgard Redman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irmgard Redman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irmgard Redman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-20 · CHIP-Theile 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #2 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-2
L
2026-02-07 · CHIP-Theile 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #2 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-3
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lin van Nieuwstadt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 73.1% of games
3.0
63.3%
31W–18L · 57.1% of games
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 41.5% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 71.2% of games
6.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.1% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 54.7% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 42% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#2 Singles
15%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe