← Search

Kristen Walton

— year-end
205 matches · 140W–65L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kristen Walton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history205 matches
L
2026-09-10 · ACAC 10sBradts · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roxann Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-04 · ACAC Tandett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-31 · ACAC 10sBradts · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · ACAC Tandett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-18 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Julie Kearfott / Sarah Boyd
2026-08-07 · ACAC Tandett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · ACAC Stallard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darlene Moehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
72.7%
80W–30L · 58.8% of games
7.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.4% of games
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.8% of games
8.0mixed
67.7%
21W–10L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#1 Singles
15%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal