← Search

Stacey Lange

— year-end
85 matches · 52W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Stacey Lange to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-09-10 · JStockwell.C.-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Furgurson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · JRosen.40C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-27 · JStockwell.C.-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Koenigshofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-24 · JRosen.40C-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carrie Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Souto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
L
2026-05-19 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Hutchins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-17 · #4 Doubles · with Carrie Williamson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · JRosen-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mignon Lunsford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-04 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · JRosen-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Munster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · JRosen-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Whilden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 57.1% of games
3.5
50%
12W–12L · 47.8% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.4% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 52.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Singles
12%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova