← Search

Amy Fikes

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 88W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Fikes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2025-11-09 · Hannah/Clifford (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Boeker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-10-26 · Hannah/Clifford (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Heit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-10-22 · Hannah/Clifford (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Boeker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-10-01 · Hannah/Clifford (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Cregger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · Hannah/Clifford (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Alice Grady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-30 · Meyer/Clifford (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-16 · Meyer/Clifford (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-03-30 · Meyer/Clifford (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Freese Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-26 · Meyer/Clifford (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-16 · Meyer/Clifford (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle McMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-03-12 · Meyer/Clifford (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Freese Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-05 · Meyer/Clifford (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
72.7%
40W–15L · 61.5% of games
3.5
51.7%
46W–43L · 52.3% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe