← Search

Heidi Saghir

Newbury, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 70W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Heidi Saghir to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-06-23 · MTS:Padgett:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · MTS:Saghir:Valeri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Valeri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-8
L
2026-05-16 · MTS:Saghir:Valeri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Valeri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-8
L
Deborah Shannon / Melissa Smith
2026-04-21 · MTS:Padgett:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-19 · MTS:Beaton:Murphy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meredith Beaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-03 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-20 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-15 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gretchen Fougere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-12-09 · MTS:Scharpf:Saghir · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-12-04 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-13 · MTS:Beaton:Murphy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Pleva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-06 · MTS:Donahue:Scharpf · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathleen Scharpf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 70.6% of games
3.5
69.8%
44W–19L · 58.2% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 60.2% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King