← Search

Angela Melasecca

Hockessin, DE
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 54W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angela Melasecca to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-06-10 · kinkySETs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · kinkySETs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-12 · SETs APPEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cadwalader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
2024-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cadwalader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Leida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dineen Driskill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Taya Dianna / Jennifer Jones
2024-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cadwalader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cadwalader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Wisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 59.1% of games
3.5
47.4%
27W–30L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 53.1% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer