← Search

Taya Dianna

Wilmington, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
397 matches · 191W–206L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Taya Dianna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history397 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Vickie Tully championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · Volleyatrics · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haiying Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Game, Set, Mimosas! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Tattersall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-24 · Volleyatrics · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Mulrooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · Uber Smash · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · After Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haiying Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Volleyatrics · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Fitzsimons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Game, Set, Mimosas! · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pia Inguito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · After Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Volleyatrics · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Mulrooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-19 · Uber Smash · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · Uber Smash · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52.1%
86W–79L · 51.1% of games
4.0
27%
10W–27L · 36.6% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.6% of games
7.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 54.6% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 32.9% of games
6.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
38.1%
16W–26L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
63.1%
41W–24L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
135 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
124 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
119 matches
#1 Singles
2%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova