← Search

Brad Sandidge

Birmingham, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 33W–44L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Brad Sandidge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-08 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · ICC - Mathis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandon Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisle Hites
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · ICC - Mathis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisle Hites
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · ICC - Mathis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Sandidge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-30 · ICC - Koz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Philip Barr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · ICC - Mathis Spring (Tu/Th) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · ICC - Mathis Spring (Tu/Th) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · ICC - Mathis Spring (Tu/Th) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandon Mathis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · ICC - Mathis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Sandidge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-11 · ICC - Koz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · ICC - Mathis Spring (Tu/Th) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50.8%
30W–29L · 49.3% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.3% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova